| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
PromptJock Super User


Joined: 26 Jul 2006 Posts: 741
|
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 12:17 am Post subject: The "death" of the ODF: what does it mean for OOo? |
|
|
I just read the "Open Document Foundation" (ODF) has "folded its' doors, etc." Will this event cause any problems for OOo in regards to future User Acceptance and further development/support?
Also, will it have any impact on Open Source projects, etc. in general?
I'm very curious to see what peoples' opinions are.  _________________ I'm making perfect sense - you're just not keeping up! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jeanweber Moderator


Joined: 30 Dec 2005 Posts: 674 Location: Queensland, Australia
|
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 12:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
The Foundation was 3 people with a grandiose organisational name, who recently decided they were not in favour of OpenDocument after all. IMO, having them fold up their organisation will either have no effect whatsoever, or it will help OpenDocument (and OpenOffice) rather than cause any problems.
The OpenDocument Alliance, and the many governments and other organisations around the world which support and have adopted OpenDocument carry a lot more weight than one small organisation. _________________ Regards, Jean Hollis Weber
Get free PDFs of OOo user guides from http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/
Printed copies http://www.lulu.com/opendocument |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
acknak Moderator


Joined: 13 Aug 2004 Posts: 4295 Location: ~ 40°N,75°W
|
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 8:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
I gave a little talk on ODF (the Format, not the Foundation) last month, and without realizing how far off course they had gone, specifically pointed to the foundation as a sign of good health; that the OASIS committee included representation from non-industry people.
While I am embarrassed now over the foundation's meltdown, I am far more worried that I was also wrong about healthy non-industry representation in making decisions. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jeanweber Moderator


Joined: 30 Dec 2005 Posts: 674 Location: Queensland, Australia
|
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 11:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
| acknak wrote: | I gave a little talk on ODF (the Format, not the Foundation) last month, and without realizing how far off course they had gone, specifically pointed to the foundation as a sign of good health; that the OASIS committee included representation from non-industry people.
While I am embarrassed now over the foundation's meltdown, I am far more worried that I was also wrong about healthy non-industry representation in making decisions. |
There are several people on the OASIS committee who are there as independents. Some (possibly all) of them were previously there under the umbrella of the Foundation, but then OASIS began enforcing its rule that an organisation can have only 2 reps on the committee, so the extra people found other ways to fund their participation on OASIS. The people I'm thinking of are some of the biggest contributors of work on the format: David Wheeler, for example, who heads the OpenFormula project which is feeding formula specifications into the ODF(ormat).. _________________ Regards, Jean Hollis Weber
Get free PDFs of OOo user guides from http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/
Printed copies http://www.lulu.com/opendocument |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BWF89 General User

Joined: 05 Nov 2004 Posts: 9
|
Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2007 3:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Even if some organization says ODF is dead what difference does it make? OpenOffice still has to use some format to save stuff in. So does KOFfice and Gnome Office.
As long as we can continue to save as ODF and read/write files written in MS formats we'll be fine. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jeanweber Moderator


Joined: 30 Dec 2005 Posts: 674 Location: Queensland, Australia
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
acknak Moderator


Joined: 13 Aug 2004 Posts: 4295 Location: ~ 40°N,75°W
|
Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 7:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
Interesting--thanks for that link Jean.
I guess I'd like to hear from one of the "less powerful" members of the committee that they feel that they have a real voice in steering the boat.
Yes, the formula spec is nice and clearly needed, but--no disrespect intended--it's free labor. The new spec is very carefully codifying the existing practice, not adding something new. It's polishing the wheel, not steering it.
Sure, Sun and IBM have put a lot of money into this and they should have their votes, but could the committee make a choice that, e.g., Sun did not agree with? What would Sun do if that happened?
In all the brouhaha over OOXML, what clearly capped it for me was when MS came right out and said they had no commitment to an open standard process; to paraphrase their statement: "If ECMA ever changed the standard in a way we didn't agree with, we would not follow the standard".
So my question is: Is OASIS substantially different? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jeanweber Moderator


Joined: 30 Dec 2005 Posts: 674 Location: Queensland, Australia
|
Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 12:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| acknak wrote: | I guess I'd like to hear from one of the "less powerful" members of the committee that they feel that they have a real voice in steering the boat. [...] The new spec is very carefully codifying the existing practice, not adding something new. It's polishing the wheel, not steering it.[...]
So my question is: Is OASIS substantially different? |
My understanding is that the OASIS ODF spec is very much "adding something new" to what already exists, for example in the area of accessibility. But I readily admit that I am not technically knowledgeable enough to have a personal opinion.
I'm not sure what you mean by "one of the 'less powerful' members of the committee". Do you mean someone who is not employed by Sun or IBM? To the best of my (limited) knowledge, the independents on the OASIS ODF TC certainly think they have a real voice, or they would not be there.
Would Sun follow the spec if the committee made a choice they did not agree with? Good question, with opportunities for endless speculation. However, note that the various flavours of OpenOffice.org are not the only products using the OpenDocument format; if one product isn't compliant, products from other sources (KOffice, Google, etc, including others to come) will offer alternatives. _________________ Regards, Jean Hollis Weber
Get free PDFs of OOo user guides from http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/
Printed copies http://www.lulu.com/opendocument |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jeanweber Moderator


Joined: 30 Dec 2005 Posts: 674 Location: Queensland, Australia
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
acknak Moderator


Joined: 13 Aug 2004 Posts: 4295 Location: ~ 40°N,75°W
|
Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 3:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks Jean--good points. Rob's article was helpful as well.
BTW, does anyone know what happened to the OpenDocument Fellowship? They had a very nice web site, with some good information and resources, but it seems to have disappeared as of a couple of weeks ago. The website (opendocumentfellowship.org) is now just a parked domain. Maybe they were connected to the (now defunct) foundation, but I don't remember hearing that. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jeanweber Moderator


Joined: 30 Dec 2005 Posts: 674 Location: Queensland, Australia
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
acknak Moderator


Joined: 13 Aug 2004 Posts: 4295 Location: ~ 40°N,75°W
|
Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 7:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ahh... good news!
Funny that I only found hits for the old .org url when I Googled it. I guess there are so many links still around to the .org domain that it still comes out at the top of the results.
Thanks, again.
PS: Wow, that's a real shame to lose your domain that way. I had heard about this happening, and have warned friends to check when they register a domain, but I couldn't find any details about actual examples. Now I have an example. Sorry you ran into these hijackers. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TerryE Super User

Joined: 16 Jul 2006 Posts: 550 Location: UK
|
Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2007 3:48 pm Post subject: Re: The "death" of the ODF: what does it mean for |
|
|
I would have though that the only two stakeholders relevant to the use of ODF in OOo is OOo itself and OASIS who is the standards body.. So picking up PromptJock's Qs, as far as I can see:- Will this event cause any problems for OOo in regards to future User Acceptance and further development/support? — No
- Will it have any impact on Open Source projects, etc. in general? — No
_________________ Terry
WinXPSP3, OOo 2.4.1, Ubunto 8.04 for development
Also try the Official OOo Community Forum where I mainly post now. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PromptJock Super User


Joined: 26 Jul 2006 Posts: 741
|
Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2008 8:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
As some may know, A Study Recently Came Out indicating "the 'industry' agrees" that Microsoft's OOXML format is "easier to use, etc." than ODF.
What do y'all think about this? could this be "a sign" that ODF is really "on the rocks, etc." or is just a Microsoft smoke-screen?
FWIW, if you check out the Cnet and ZDNet web site articles from this past Monday, you'll see what I'm referring to... _________________ I'm making perfect sense - you're just not keeping up! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TerryE Super User

Joined: 16 Jul 2006 Posts: 550 Location: UK
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|