| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Guest
|
Posted: Thu Apr 29, 2004 12:29 pm Post subject: Calc Scalability |
|
|
| I am interested in the feasibility of using Calc as part of a server application running large spreadsheet files (currently 100+ linked worksheets in excel)... and ultimately multiple concurrent instances of Calc with such files. I understand there is a 32K row limit. What else is known about Calc's scalability characteristics or how they may be improved in Q/OO2? Thx, stevef |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
erikanderson3 OOo Advocate

Joined: 25 Feb 2004 Posts: 332 Location: San Francisco peninsula
|
Posted: Thu May 06, 2004 7:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Of particular note, OOo is currently not thread safe. This makes it mostly unsuitable as a server, unless you have some other app running as a queue and only handing new tasks to OOo once the previous one has completed. I don't know what the status is of this issue vis-a-vis OOo 2.0.
Cheers,
Erik |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
antonbijl OOo Advocate

Joined: 04 Aug 2003 Posts: 291 Location: Pretoria, South Africa
|
Posted: Wed May 19, 2004 2:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
IMHO, Calc isn't ready for this type of task. Apart from the fact that it isn't really suitable as a server as Erik mentioned above, my experience is that it struggles with large spreadsheets too.
I have a 72-sheet spreadsheet with an average of about 100 rows per sheet and about 15 columns per sheet and performance is horrible (That's running OOo 1.1.1 under WinXP on a Pentium 4, 2.4GHz machine with 512 MB RAM). If I double the amount of rows in each sheet performance degrades to such an extent that the spreadsheet becomes completely unusable. Ok, this is a special case and I am using a lot of lookups between the various sheets etc. etc., but still (as much I hate admitting it) the same spreadsheet in Excel performs markedly better.
HTH
Anton |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|